KIM JONG IL, SERIOUSLY.

What if, instead of being completely unrelated to Kim Jong Il's impending ballistic missile launch, the freighter, Kang Nam, is actually the primary delivery platform for a nuclear strike, or a secondary platform to the missile, or in fact, merely some kind of nuclear insurance policy, just in case the US or UN actually interfere in either's mission? Surely, a freighter would be a far more reliable delivery system, and capable of carrying a far bigger payload, than a missile of questionable range and/or reliability. What if he truly intends on making good on his threat, to treat any action against an asset of N. Korea as an act of war? Perhaps the freighter is the means with which be intends to respond?

N. Korea contemplating a missile launch toward Alaska?

I know that Barack Obama and Kim Jong Il share a lot of political beliefs, and I'm sure Obama envies the N. Korean dictator his political free-hand, but having his maniacal Asian buddy nuke Juneau, just because Alaska's governor is a little critical of his policies, seems a little harsh. If it works, watch-out Fox News Channel!