KIM JONG IL, SERIOUSLY.

What if, instead of being completely unrelated to Kim Jong Il's impending ballistic missile launch, the freighter, Kang Nam, is actually the primary delivery platform for a nuclear strike, or a secondary platform to the missile, or in fact, merely some kind of nuclear insurance policy, just in case the US or UN actually interfere in either's mission? Surely, a freighter would be a far more reliable delivery system, and capable of carrying a far bigger payload, than a missile of questionable range and/or reliability. What if he truly intends on making good on his threat, to treat any action against an asset of N. Korea as an act of war? Perhaps the freighter is the means with which be intends to respond?

N. Korea contemplating a missile launch toward Alaska?

I know that Barack Obama and Kim Jong Il share a lot of political beliefs, and I'm sure Obama envies the N. Korean dictator his political free-hand, but having his maniacal Asian buddy nuke Juneau, just because Alaska's governor is a little critical of his policies, seems a little harsh. If it works, watch-out Fox News Channel!

WHERE'S THE LOVE?

OK, the people of the United States elected Barack Obama, and the mainstream media around the world hailed his ascension as the beginning of a new Age of Peace. He would abandon the errant ways of his predecessors, and make peace with words and an open hand, instead of a mailed fist. What happened? What happened to the brunches on the White House lawn? Why haven't the leaders of N. Korea, Iran, Cuba and Venezuela stood-down their armies, cancelled their WMD programs, and RSVPd for the Obama Love Fest 2009? Weren't they watching MSNBC? Didn't they feel Chris Matthew's thrill? Didn't they see all the tears and hugs on Inauguration Day? What else doesn't Obama get right? Stay tuned, reality is just around the corner.